Case Study 2 - Del and Rod
Del, 20, and Rod, 18, were arrested for spray painting
murals on trains, stations and other railway property. They were caught
when British Transport Police found images of their work on websites which
they used to trace their email addresses. Between them they had caused
£13,000 worth of damage.
They were sentenced for 15 months and 12 months respectively
for vandalising railway property and were sent to a young offenders institute.
They were also both given five-year Anti Social Behaviour Orders (ASBOs).
Before being sentenced, Del had worked in over 50 youth
centres and schools holding graffiti art workshops, conveying messages
through art, working on issues from gun crime, racism, bullying, healthy
eating and drugs.
In the week that they were sent to prison, Rod was also
due to start university.
The judge who sentenced the pair admitted they were "decent"
but insisted their behaviour should be punished as a deterrent. He said:
"This conduct has caused an unpleasant nuisance as well as disruption
and expense. You are decent people who have a talent, but those who scar
railways and other people's property have to be deterred. This kind of
behaviour is carried out for self-indulgent gratification."
Rod's mother said, What they've
done is against the law but the punishment should fit the crime. We offered
to pay for the damage just to keep them out of prison, so that my son
could go to university which he should have started this week. The British
Transport Police just dismissed it.
Questions for discussion:
· Do you think this was the right sentence? If
not, what sentence should they have been given?
· What do you think of what the judge said
do you agree or disagree?
· What do you think of what Rods mother said
do you agree or disagree?
What happened?
After two months in prison the sentences were overturned.
The judges at the Court of Appeal decided each should receive a two-year
conditional discharge and said they should never have gone to prison in
the first place. The "positive features" in their cases should
also have persuaded the original trial judge a community sentence was
the appropriate punishment.
Five-year Asbos were also quashed as the judges said the
Asbos were "inappropriate" because the graffiti was not threatening
or offensive.
Del said "I spent months sitting in a prison cell
doing nothing costing the tax payer thousands - when instead I could have
been doing compulsory work in the community as my punishment. This is
far more use to the local area, and to other young offenders - who could
be intimidated to learn new crimes from violent and much more serious
offenders, rather than learning new skills to help them find a job when
they have finished their sentence."
Questions for discussion:
· Do you think it was right or wrong that the sentence
was overturned?
· What do you think about the Asbos?
· What do you think of what Del said about being
in prison?
Useful facts:
· The re-offending rate for people released from
prison is 64.7% for adults and 72.6% for children. The reoffending rates
for those on community sentences 50.5%. Community sentences can include
unpaid work in the community and treatment for mental health problems
or addictions.
· There around 12,500 under 21s locked up in England
and Wales. 3,000 of them are under 18.
· The number of 15 to 17 year olds in prison has
doubled in the last 10 years, and in this country we lock up more young
people per head than anywhere else in Europe.
· You can be locked up as young as 10 in England
and Wales - the lowest age for criminal responsibility in Europe, except
for Scotland, where it is 8 years old.
· Almost half the children in prison have been
convicted of non-violent offences. More children are in prison for robbery
than any other offence.
· Reconviction rates are extremely high for young
people. Over eight out of ten boys under 18 who were released from prison
were reconvicted within two years.
· It costs £50,800 per year to send someone
to a young offenders institution.
· 29 children have died in state custody since
1990, most committed suicide but one following restraint.